Mickaël Salaün, the landlock author, pointed out the same error on the got implementation. The assumption that not listed access capabilities are implicitly denied is completely wrong: > In a nutshell, the ruleset's handled_access_fs is required for > backward and forward compatibility (i.e. the kernel and user space may > not know each other's supported restrictions), hence the need to be > explicit about the denied-by-default access rights.

> implicit declaration of function 'asprintf'; did you mean 'vsprintf'?

IRI and Punycode tests don't run gmid binary and can be safely executed.