u9fs like to return "i/o count too large" on reads/writes that exceeds msize - 24. seems arbiratry, as in theory we should be able to issue a Tread/Twrite for msize - (HEADERSIZE + 4) = msize - 13. Don't know where the other eleven bits come from. To conclude the rant: even if a client issues a Tread/write too large, why don't just return a value smaller than requested? It's explicitly documented in the plan9 manpage for Tread.

* fix twstat handling of mode bits * rejects incoming connections with a ridiculously small msize * allow "jumbo" (i.e. more than 16K) Twrite and Treads * allow Tread to read exactly msize bytes * kamiftp: fix reads wrt msize * kamiftp: do maximum reads and writes